Newsletter
- Aug 1999
SOME
MORE ABOUT OUR LOGO
Original
Design Concept
The
original design concept of the logo evolves around its two initials
The I.I. Insurance Institute.
The
two Is was designed in a symmetrical and three-dimensional
layout using color contrast and formed into the shape of an arrow.
The tip of the arrow pointed upwards.
Color
The
choice of using lighter and darker shade of green was adopted, basically
to reflect the liveliness and the continuous growing process of
the Institute, and green color is environmental friendly.
Meaning
The
two Is basically represents the Insurance Institute.
Alternatively,
as the aim of the Institute is to ensure continuous development
and to improve the cutting edge of its members and practitioners
and to provide quality services to the ultimate consumers, there
is a close link between Insurers and the Insured and the two Is
can also be taken as symbolic of the relationship between Insurer
and the Insured.
The
upward pointing arrow symbolizes the institutes always strive to
move ahead.
Finally,
the use of the lighter and darker shades of green in the two Is
is a reflection of the Yin Yang Symbol and embraces an element of
harmony balance and tranquility.
The Designer
The Logo was
originally designed by Mr. Peter W.T. Wong who has been in the Insurance
Industry throughout and is now the Managing Director of Toplis and
Harding (Hong Kong) Ltd.
Insurance
Beyond Year 2000 in Asia
Herebelow
is the Keynote Speech delivered by the Commissioner of Insurance
at the Third Annual Conference of Asia-Pacific Risk and Insurance
Association held on 19.7.1999.
"Good
Morning, Ladies and Gentlemen,
I
am honoured to be invited to address this distinguished gathering
of scholars and insurance practitioners coming from different countries
in the Asia Pacific Region, I would like to share with you some
of my observations of the insurance industry in Asia beyond Year
2000.
In
the beginning of the next millennium, insurers in the region will
face a number of challenges.
The
first challenge is how to survive the soft market conditions in
respect of non-life business which have persisted for several years
and aggravated by the Asian economic turmoil. In Hong Kong, the
gross premiums from these lines of business have been on the decline
since 1995 and last year dropped by 8% to just over US$2.3 billion.
The competition among insurers has become so tense that offers of
"cut throat" premium rates are not uncommon. Insurers
have been trying hard to maintain their market share by satisfying
as far as possible the expectations of the policyholders which are
rising as a result of increasing awareness of their rights and bargaining
power. The severe competition has led to an alarming underwriting
loss of about US$100 million for the industry as a whole.
The
second challenge is the structural transformation of the insurance
market as a result of rapid technological progress and the increasing
sophistication of the policyholders, who now actively seek alternative
channels, such as internet and telesales, to maximise their value
for money. The competitiveness of premium rates is invariably the
key factor for their decisions regarding risk management and financing.
To explore new markets, many insurers make great efforts to penetrate
into various potential client sectors and launch new and innovative
products. The traditional agent-driven face-to-face selling practice
is no longer the only distribution channel.
The
convergence of financial services i.e. banking, insurance, investment
and asset management poses a third challenge to insurers. Increasingly,
life insurance policies offer investment opportunities that compete
with mutual funds and unit trust. "Bancassurance" is becoming
more and more popular. Insurance agents now face competition not
only from the internet and tele-marketers but also from banks and
a new breed of financial advisors. The latter sell a variety of
financial products and services including financial planning, fund
management and insurance. The demarcation line among the traditionally
distinct and separate financial services is blurring.
The
fourth challenge comes from the liberalisation of the Asian insurance
markets. The need for additional capital to insure the risks arising
from national development has reinforced the liberalisation and
deregulation process. Besides Korea and Japan where the regulatory
authorities are changing their laws to allow domestic insurers to
look for foreign partners. Thailand and Indonesia are also relaxing
their foreign ownership restrictions. In Hong Kong, we have always
allowed free market access and full foreign ownership the
ultimate goal of the World Trade Organisation for years.
How to cope with the more competitive market environment caused
by entry of foreign insurers through technology absorption, professionalisation
of insurance practitioners, and application of risk and financial
management skills is going to be a great challenge not only to domestic
insurers but also to regulators.
In
Hong Kong, there are at present 207 insurers. Competition in the
industry is intense and will remain so beyond the Year 2000. Acquisitions
and mergers will continue to take place as the industry consolidates.
Insurers who are under-performing will be driven out of business.
The number of insurers will decrease and large insurers, who are
able to benefit from the economy of scale, will emerge. A classic
case of "survival of the fittest".
With
the integration of the financial services, more financial one-stop
shops will be set up offering a full range of banking, insurance,
pension and investment products. Banks, investment houses and insurance
companies will form strategic alliances to explore the merging markets.
The
21st century will be an age of Information Technology.
Computers will become an indispensable part of our daily lives.
With the increasing usage of internet at home, direct sales through
electronic means (e.g. e-commerce) will be employed by insurers
to market their products, alongside their traditional agency distribution
networks.
As
regards reinsurance, alternative risk transfer and risk securitisation
(e.g. CAT bonds) will be more commonly used as risk management tools.
These tools of risk financing will enable insurers and reinsurers
to gain access to the capital markets thereby expanding their underwriting
capacity.
Life
insurance is expected to be rich in growth potential in Asia. Take
Hong Kong for example, at present, only 3.4 million people, out
of a population of 6.3 million, have taken out life insurance policies.
The penetration rate, which is just over 50%, is much lower than
those of the developed countries like the United States and Japan.
There is ample room for expansion. Life insurance business has grown
by about 20% annually in the last 5 years in Hong Kong. The momentum
of growth will be sustained in the foreseeable future. The implementation
of the Mandatory Provident Fund schemes will generate a large amount
of funds by the end of year 2000 (from US$2 billion up to US$8 billion
upon maturity). The life insurance industry is expected to get a
fair share of this market. I understand that the life insurance
business is also growing rapidly in other Asian countries, particularly
Mainland China.
With
the rapid development of the insurance markets, the demand for insurance
expertise will continue to rise. In Hong Kong, we established a
steering committee last year to conduct a review of the need for,
and feasibility of, setting up a Financial Services Institute to
co-ordinate the training of professionals for the financial services
sector. We have also taken steps to promote degree-level insurance
education. As some of you are already aware, the Lingnan College,
soon to be designated as Lingnan University, has launched a degree
programme related to insurance and risk management. This programme
embraces not only insurance but also other business subjects so
as to equip our future insurance executives with all-round commercial
knowledge.
Equally
important is the education of the insurance intermediaries who are
on the front-line and constitute an overwhelming majority of the
insurance practitioners. In Hong Kong, in order to ensure the high
professional standard of insurance intermediaries, we have initiated
earlier this year an Insurance Intermediaries Quality Assurance
Scheme. Under the scheme, insurance agents and brokers are required
to be properly trained and qualified through a public examination.
They will also be required to attend continuing professional development
programmes as a condition for re-registration.
So
far I have only talked about the challenges facing the insurance
industry in Asia. I would also like to say a few words on the likely
developments in respect of regulation of the industry in the 21st
century.
To
facilitate the development of the insurance market, a sound regulatory
framework is required to maintain systemic stability and to protect
the interests of policyholders. It is necessary to strike a reasonable
balance between the market mechanism and regulation, and to keep
the compliance costs low.
Regulators,
sooner or later, will have to be properly equipped to handle electronic
submission and dissemination of financial information regarding
the insurance industry. They are also required to keep abreast of
new risk management and financing tools as well as market practices
through continuing professional development training. The industry
will be required to be more transparent in order to enable the insuring
public to gain access to the financial and statistical information
relating to the operation of individual insurers. Market transparency
is crucial to the consumer protection as it enables policyholders
to make better informed decisions.
As
insurance becomes more intricately linked with other financial services,
greater co-operation among the financial regulators, both locally
and internationally, is not just desirable but necessary. Effective
cross-border supervision of multinational insurance companies requires
information exchange and technical cooperation between regulators.
In Hong Kong, we will continue to participate actively in the activities
of the International Association of Insurance Supervisors and to
maintain close liaison with our counterparts, in particular the
newly established China Insurance Regulatory Commission.
As
a closing note, I wish that all participants would find this conference
useful and enlightening, and the visitors from overseas a most enjoyable
stay in Hong Kong.
Thank
you."
Alan Wong,
JP
The Commissioner of Insurance
Insurance
Accounting Insight SSAP 24
Accounting Standard for Investments in Securities
In
Hong Kong, it is fair to say that insurance companies have historically
had a lot of latitude in accounting for their investments in securities
latitude which led to a variety of different accounting practices
being adopted
So
perhaps not too much cheering on the issuance of SSAP 24!
Issued
in April 1999, SSAP 24 is the first Hong Kong Accounting Standard
to deal specifically with investments in securities (other than
subsidiaries/associates). The key requirements prescribed by the
standard include:-
- Classification
and measurement
- Treatment
of gains and losses
- Accounting
disclosure requirements
SSAP
24 applies to all Hong Kong insurers (as they now all need Hong
Kong GAAP accounts), as well as all Hong Kong incorporated intermediaries.
It will be effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January
1999 which for many will be the coming 31 December 1999 year-end.
The
new standard prescribes a consistent framework for accounting for
investment securities. However, for securities other than those
categorised as Held-To-Maturity, there is a choice of either the
Benchmark or Alternative treatments.
Accounting
Treatment
|
Category of Investment
|
Classification Criteria
|
Carrying Value
|
Treatment of Gains and Losses
|
- Held-To-Maturity
(certain debt instruments only)
|
Expressed intention and ability to
hold the security until maturity |
Amortised cost less provision for
impairment in value |
|
|
|
|
|
All realised gains and losses are
recognised in the profit and loss account as they arise. Impairment
provisions are also charged to the profit and loss account. |
|
Category
of Investment
|
Classification
Criteria
|
Carrying
Value
|
Treatment
of Gains and Losses
|
- Benchmark
|
Identifiable
long term purpose to be held on a continuing basis
|
Cost less
provision for impairment in value
|
|
|
- Alternative
|
Other
than "Investment Securities"
For purpose
of generating profit from short term price fluctuations
|
Fair
value
Fair
value
|
All realised
and unrealised gains and losses are recognised in the profit
and loss account as they arise
|
|
|
Other
than "Trading Securities" |
Fair
value
|
Changes
in fair value are recognised in a revaluation reserve until
the security is disposed of or determined to be "impaired",
at which time the cumulative gain or loss is recognised in the
profit and loss account |
(reference
should be made to SSAP 24 for detailed guidance on classification
and measurement, and determining whether impairment provisions are
required)
To "Benchmark"
or to be "Alternative"
Key
considerations include
There
are two features of the Alternative treatment which might appeal
to insurers, namely:-
- In determining
investment security carrying values, fair value bases might result
in a stronger balance sheet than the cost basis.
- For "Non
Trading Securities", normal fluctuations in fair value are
recognised in a revaluation reserve, thereby "insulating"
the profit and loss account from market volatility.
Whichever
treatment is adopted, there could well be tax implications. For
example, under the Benchmark treatment, unrealised gains on "Other
Investments" are taken to the profit and loss account, which
could accelerate their taxation.
The
Alternative treatment requires all non Held-To-Maturity investment
securities to be carried at fair value. This may lead to a higher
reported solvency than the Benchmark treatment, which requires
"Investment Securities" to be carried at cost. Due consideration
must also be given to the effects of the Insurance Companies (General
Business) (Valuation) Regulation.
Against
using the Alternative treatment, all unlisted investments are
required to be carried at fair value, prompting the need for valuations
to be performed every time accounts are prepared. The administrative
burden of performing this exercise on unlisted investments should
not be overlooked. Under the Benchmark treatment, unlisted investments
classified as "Investment Securities" may be carried
at cost less provision for impairment in value, which might be
easier to determine.
In
summary
SSAP
24 could have significant consequences for your business. It may
affect your tax position and (potentially) solvency, as well as
placing an additional administrative burden on your accounting department
at year-end. More importantly, it has implications for the impression
which your financial statements will give to the market (and rating
agencies).
If
you have not done so already, seek professional advice now!
Peter
Whalley
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Financial Services Division
P.S.
This article is a brief overview only and should not be taken as
a substitute for professional advice or used as a basis on which
to formulate business decisions.
Presidents
Message
It
has been almost three months since I have been elected to be the
President of the Institute. A lot of things have been happening
that I would like to brief you all in this corner.
In
our application for Services Support Fund from the Government in
the development of Local Insurance Qualification, sadly to say that
we have failed in our 2nd attempt even though we have
been short-listed for phase II review. By no means, we have been
defeated or given up our hope in this project. Our Local Qualification
Committee will continue working even harder in looking for support
and avenues in making this project a success. Taking this opportunity,
I would like to sincerely thank our Committee Chairman Mr. Elex
Chan together with his devoted and hard working team Ms. Irene Wong
and Mr. Graham Norris. Also, I would like to thank our Commissioner,
Mr. Alan Wong and our Legislator, the Honorable Mr. Bernard Chan,
for their valuable support, advice and encouragement.
In
April, Our Immediate Past President 1998/99 Mr. Jackie Chun attended
the "99 Mainland, Hong Kong Insurance Conference" in Beijing
and delivered a paper on behalf of the Institute. In May, we had
Ms. Joan Fitzpatrick, CEO of Australian Insurance Institute visiting
us. In June, together with Fire Insurance Association, we held a
seminar on "Drainage system". In July, we will co-host
with Lingnan College the 3rd Annual Conference of Asia-Pacific
Risk & Insurance Association at Royal Plaza Hotel and Lingnan
College.
We
will soon go into the next millennium. Insurance industry, with
no exception, will also undergo changes to keep up with this ever
rapidly changing world. As service industry, education is of basic
importance to promote high professional standard. Insurance industry
has in the past contributed about 4% of GNP in Hong Kong and it
is about time that we get the same recognition as the other industry
in the financial services such as banking, securities etc. from
the government and the public. We may not be the most important
body in this field but we aim at upgrading the standard of insurance
practitioners with our limited resources. Our current target is
to encourage study on insurance and to certify our own "Qualified
people" through examination at a professional level to be recognized
by the public and overseas. This can only be achieved with your
continued support.
Peter Leung
President
Legislative
Highlights
Starting
from this issue, this column will present to you the latest insurer-related
developments in the Legislative Council. For further details you
may refer to my monthly newsletter or contact my office at 2545
0496.
The
heartening exemption on life insurance proceeds from estate duty
as announced by the Financial Secretary in the 1999-2000
Budget officially passed the Legislative Council on 8 July
1999. The new measure has come to effect from 1 April 1999 upon
the enactment of the Public Revenue Protection (Revenue) Order 1999
as a temporary measure. The subsequent Revenue Bill 1999 which includes
the insurance proceeds exemption has to go through a lengthy legislative
process. It was until 8 July 1999 that the Bill passed three readings
in the Council and came to enforcement.
At
the same meeting, the Council passed the Merchant Shipping (Local
Vessels) Bill which extends the requirement of compulsory third
party risk insurance to all local vessels permitted to operate in
Hong Kong waters. At present the requirement is applicable only
to local ferries, launches and pleasure vessels. The minimum insurance
cover for third party risks for passenger vessels and non-passenger
vessels is proposed to be $10 million and $5 million respectively.
The insurance sector has expressed reservation about an unlimited
insurance cover given that most insurance companies do not have
operational experience in third party risks insurance in respect
of local vessels. Hence such a minimum amount will be set in the
subsequent regulation in the light of insurers concern.
The
Government has clarified that the legislation covers Mainland vessels
with entry permits issued by the Marine Department. Those vessels
are required to purchase insurance policies from authorized Mainland
insurers. The Marine Department has the right to restrict entry
of unauthorized Mainland vessels.
At
the last meeting of this legislative session on 14 July 1999, the
Council also passed the Insurance Companies (Amendment) Bill 1999
which provides the regulatory frameworks governing the operation
of Lloyds. Lloyds is not a conventional insurance company
but rather a market place for corporate or individual members underwriting
business for their own behalf. Due to this unique mode of operation,
many countries, like Hong Kong, have made special provisions to
enable Lloyds underwriters to transact insurance business.
The Bill was endorsed by the Council without debate.
The
Hon. Bernard Chan
Institute
News
HK diploma
in Insurance Studies 1999 First Series Examination
The
Examination Committee is currently processing the results of the
above examination and will hold the Board of Examiners meeting
shortly.
We
have received some comments from the examination markers on candidates
answers and we would like to quote some of them here. These will
be very useful to those who shall write the future examinations.
General
remarks by the markers:
Candidates
should give more thought to what are required in the questions before
they attempt them. Otherwise, time will be wasted and effort will
be channeled in the wrong direction.
Examination
markers also reminded candidates to answer questions in essay form,
and point form is acceptable when used to illustrate arguments/comparisons.
Comments
that are specific to the subjects include:
Introduction
to Insurance
Most
of the questions were well answered. There were some points that
future candidates should note:
- The distinction
between agents/brokers, reinsurance/co-insurance.
- If the question
asks one to differentiate, it is important that this is done after
the basic characteristics are described.
Principles
and Practice of Insurance
For
the question on contribution (Question 5b), most candidates associated
Contribution with the ratable proportion condition rather
than an indemnifying insurers right to contribution as what
it was meant in the question. In the same question, some candidates
mistook co-insurance (with the insured) as the co-insurance
where an insured has arranged separate primary contracts with a
number of (co-) insurers on the same risk.
The
least attempted question was Question 7, which was on stock declaration.
There were only three candidates attempted this question and they
had little knowledge on the topic. The marker was of the view that
had they studied the topic hard enough, they would have found it
easy to score good marks in this question.
Legal
Principles
There
were several topics that candidates did not answer very well and
they included:
- The constitutional
order of Hong Kong, especially when conflicts occur after the
return of Hong Kong to the Mainland.
- The concepts
of strict liability.
- Rules for
the interpretation of statutes.
***************************************************************************
The Hong
Kong Diploma in Insurance Studies
Examination
Revision Classes for Autumn 99
Revision
Classes will start on August 16 in the Financial Services Development
Centre.
Interested
members can contact the centre directly at 2836 1862.
***************************************************************************
Bowling
Tournament
Although
it may seem to be a long way in the future we would ask you to mark
Thursday 4th November 1999 on the date of the I.I.H.K.
annual team bowling tournament.
More
details will be sent nearer the date, but perhaps it is time to
think about forming a team and preparing entry as we are always
over-subscribed.
Mike
Haynes PR & Social
|
Membership Change Form
|
| |
|
To: Mr. Kelvin Cheung, Membership Sub-Committee
Chairman (Fax No. 2882 3760)
|
| |
| Permanent IIHK Member No.
.. |
|
Name (surname first): Mr/Miss/Mrs.*
...
|
|
Employer
...
|
|
Office Address
...
|
|
...
|
|
Home Address
...
|
|
...
|
|
Correspondence Address: Office / Home* Address
|
|
Office Tel No.
Fax No.
..
|
|
Home Tel No.
Fax No.
..
|
|
Insurance Qualification (please tick whichever
is applicable)
|
|
Dip IIHK FCII ACII FAII
|
|
AAII Mem AII Aff AII ANZII
|
|
MSTI CII others (please specify)
...
|
| |
|
*Delete as appropriate
|
|